The petitioner stated it did not wish to press the writ petition. The bench dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 156 of 2022
Petitioner :- M/S Hardayal Charitable And Educational Trust Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Sharma,Mahima Jaiswal,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anant Kumar Tiwari,Gaurav Mahajan,Praveen Kumar
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and, therefore, it may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 27.4.2022 sfa/
Digitally signed by SYED FAHEEM AHMAD Date: 2022.04.27 17:00:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Hardayal Charitable And Educational Trust
Union Of India
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
