Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time since 2001. Interim order vacated. Respondents directed to realize property, damages and execution fee.
petitioner may be required to realise property, damages and execution fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9042 of 2002
Petitioner :- Lala Ram Respondent :- Collector Kanpur Dehat And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Notices were issued to the sole petitioner by registered post to engage another counsel. The service of registered notice be sufficient but no Vakalatnama has been filed.
None appears for the petitioner even in the revised call.
The matter relates to the year 2001. It appears that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Concerned respondents may proceed to realize the property in suit, the damages and execution fee from the petitioner in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 14.12.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.12.15 09:58:03 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Lala Ram
Collector Kanpur Dehat
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
