The High Court at Allahabad held the present writ petition to be infructuous as the order had already been passed by the D.R.T. and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8465 of 2022
Petitioner :- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Respondent :- Presiding Officer And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Misra,Sandeep Arora Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Mohan Asthana
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard Shri Om Prakash Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel and; Shri Krishna Mohan Asthana, learned counsel for the respondent D.R.T.
At the outset, Shri Misra states, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the order has been passed by the D.R.T.
Accordingly, the present petition has been dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.5.2022 Prakhar
Digitally signed by PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.05.07 10:18:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Presiding Officer And 7 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
