Shakuntala Devi v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No one appeared to press the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
No one appeared to press the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 74112 of 2011
Petitioner :- Shakuntala Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.P. Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
The case has been taken up in the revised call.
No one is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition even in the revised call.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.9.2022 AU
Digitally signed by ADEEB UDDIN Date: 2022.09.29 14:20:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakuntala Devi
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others
Siddhartha Varma
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court