No one being present for the parties to press the writ petition, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18554 of 2010
Petitioner :- Prof. Ashok Kumar Saxena Respondent :- Vc D.D.U. Gorakhpur University And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Smt. Sunita Agrawal,S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
The case has been taken up in the revised call.
No one is present for the parties to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.9.2022 vkj
(Ajit Singh, J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.30 15:58:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Prof. Ashok Kumar Saxena
Vc D.D.U. Gorakhpur University
Siddhartha Varma
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
