The single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous by passage of time. The order was consequential and did not engage with the merits or cite specific provisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6985 of 2022
Petitioner :- Samar Singh Alias Guddu Mahewa Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulab Chandra,Rupesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Rupesh Kumar Singh, counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition has become infructuous by passage of time.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.3.2022 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN Date: 2022.03.31 11:12:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Samar Singh Alias Guddu Mahewa
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
