Held the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel. Vacated interim order dated 04.02.2000.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order dated 04.02.2000 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6142 of 2000
Petitioner :- Ambika Prasad Tiwari And Anr. Respondent :- Mata Shanker And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- K.P. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,C.D.Mishra
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
On 11.10.2022 due to non-appearance of the counsel for the petitioners substitution application was rejected.
Today again none appears for the petitioner even in the revised call. Sri J.N. Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order dated 04.02.2000 stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.12.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.12.02 17:33:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambika Prasad Tiwari And Anr.
Mata Shanker And Ors.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
