Petitioner's petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no rejoinder affidavit was filed and no one appeared to represent the petitioners despite direction.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47044 of 2003
Petitioner :- Lakhmi And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Collector And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Pande,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
None appears for the petitioners even in the revised call. Sri Hari Shankar holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Gram Panchayat is present.
On 13.10.2022, learned counsel for the petitioners was directed to file rejoinder affidavit but neither any rejoinder affidavit has been filed nor any one is present to represent the petitioners.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 1.12.2022 Shahroz
Digitally signed by SHAHROJ ALAM Date: 2022.12.02 17:33:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Lakhmi And Others
State Of U.P. Thru Collector And Others
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
