The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time as no counsel appeared to press the petitions. The order date is 06.09.2022 signed by Hony. Judge Piyush Agrawal.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 50500 of 2000
Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Chhabra Respondent :- Defence Estate Officer And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Khare,Pankaj Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- S.N.Srivastava,SC
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The above case is listed under the heading "likely to be infructuous."
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
In view of above, it appears that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application within a period of one month from today, seeking recall of this order, in case the matter is still surviving.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.09.06 15:16:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Kumar Chhabra
Defence Estate Officer And Another
Hony. Judge Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
