The writ petition was listed as likely to be infructuous. Due to the efflux of time and absence of the petitioner, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4347 of 2001
Petitioner :- Raghuvansh Raman Respondent :- Union Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,S.N.Srivastava-180/2001,Subodh Kumar,T.N. Tiwari
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The above case is listed under the heading "likely to be infructuous."
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
In view of above, it appears that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application within a period of one month from today, seeking recall of this order, in case the matter is still surviving.
Order Date :- 9.9.2022
samz
Digitally signed by SYED AKHTARMOHAMMAD MEQDAD Date: 2022.09.09 12:14:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghuvansh Raman
Union Of India
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
