A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and the efflux of time, rendering the matter no longer surviving. Any interim orders are vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 53240 of 2000
Petitioner :- Bihari And Others Respondent :- A.D.J. Iii Jaunpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.R.Yadav,Udai Narain Singh,V.S.Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,C.P.Dwivedi,K.P.S.Yadav,Mohammad Isa Khan,Moti Lal
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The above case is listed under the heading "likely to be infructuous."
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
In view of above, it appears that by efflux of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The parties are at liberty to move an appropriate application within a period of one month from today, seeking recall of this order, in case the matter is still surviving.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022
samz
Digitally signed by SYED AKHTARMOHAMMAD MEQDAD Date: 2022.09.08 16:36:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bihari And Others
A.D.J. Iii Jaunpur And Others
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
