Disposed

M/S Neercare Agro Pvt. Ltd. v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and 2 Others

Allahabad HC23 Dec 2022WRIC/40291/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition for oral mention, referring the matter to a previous order (Writ-C No.17175 of 2022) allowing the petitioner to file objections and maintaining status quo, finding similar grounds.

What did the court decide?

Disposed in same terms as Writ-C No.17175 of 2022, permitting filing of objections within ten days and maintaining status quo for twenty days.

M/S Neercare Agro Pvt. Ltd. Vs New Okhla Industrial… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 21

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40291 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- M/S Neercare Agro Pvt Ltd. Respondent :- New Okhla Industrial Development Authority And 2 Others

¶4

Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishesh Rajvanshi,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.

¶6

On oral mention made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is extremely urgent as there is threat of demolition of constructions of the petitioner, we sent for the record of the case and it is heard in presence of Shri N.C. Rajvanshi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Vishesh Rajvanshi and Shri Akshay Pundir for the petitioner, Shri Kuashalendra Nath Singh for respondent-NOIDA Authority and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.

¶7

The petitioner has called in question a public notice dated 08.06.2022.

¶8

Shri N.C. Rajvanshi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel appearing on behalf of NOIDA Authority state that the instant matter is covered by the order passed on 14.6.2022 in Writ-C No.17175 of 2022 (Harit Kisan Kalyan Samiti Vs. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and others) . The said writ petition was disposed of with the following directions:-

¶9

"We are of the opinion that the aforesaid course, if adopted, will sub-serve the ends of justice. We, accordingly, permit the petitioner-society and its members to file objection within ten days in pursuance of the impugned public notice, as also agreed to by learned counsel for the petitioner, and in which event, the same shall be decided by respondent no.2 by means of

¶10

a speaking order. For a period of twenty days from today, the status quo as of date shall be maintained by all the parties.

¶11

In case, the petitioner and its members fail to file objection within ten days from today, it shall be open to the respondent-authority to proceed further in pursuance of the impugned public notice."

¶12

Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in same terms.

¶13

Order Date :- 23.12.2022 SK

¶14

(Jayant Banerji, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

M/S Neercare Agro Pvt. Ltd. v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Neercare Agro Pvt. Ltd. v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daleep Singh Vs Union of India and 5 Others

Bilal Ahamad Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

M/S Jay Prakash Thekedar Vs Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and Another

Shakeel Ahmad and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Irshad Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jararuddin Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others