Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel for both parties agreed to the withdrawal of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3708 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Pratibha Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheetla Sahai Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vaibhav Dixit
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Sheetla Sahai Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner states that writ petition be dismissed as not pressed.
Sri Vaibhav Dixit, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur has no objection to the same.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 1.4.2022 Kirti
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Digitally signed by KIRTI SAHU Date: 2022.04.01 15:35:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pratibha Sharma
State Of U.P.
Kirti Sahu
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
