In a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 14 SARFAESI Act to a borrower, the court dismissed the petition without any substantive hearing as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The challenge was unsustainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30098 of 2022
Petitioner :- M/S Pal Enterprises Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Rana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Habib Ahmad
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
Sri Habib Ahmad learned counsel for the respondent No.4 is present.
The challenge is to notice issued to the petitioner who is the borrower participated in the proceeding under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act' 2002. The challenge to the show cause notice cannot be sustained.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 21.11.2022 Himanshu
Digitally signed by HIMANSHU YADAV Date: 2022.11.22 09:54:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Pal Enterprises
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
