Pinky Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 39

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27568 of 2022

Petitioner :- Pinky Chauhan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jai Shanker Misra,Vijai Shanker Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh

¶4

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh learned Advocate on behalf of respondent-NOIDA.

¶6

The prayer in the present writ petition is to issue a mandamus commanding the respondent to decide the application dated 02.09.2014 moved by the petitioner for allotment of residential plot in the scheme of Residential Plot Scheme-2011 (01) as Amended 2014, (Only for Agricultural Category of NOIDA).

¶7

On the instructions received by Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh learned Advocate for the respondent-NOIDA, it is submitted that the draw of plots with respect to the scheme in question has been held. The allotment and possession letters have been issued to the allottees.

¶8

In light of the above, we do not find any good ground to entertain the claim of the petitioner for early disposal of the application filed by her.

¶9

However, it is provided that the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh application for allotment of residential plot in the scheme in question, if there are vacant plots.

¶10

In case, such an application is moved by the petitioner within a period of two weeks along with the copy of this order, the respondent no. 2 namely the Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA Industrial Development Authority, Gautam Budha Nagar shall be under obligation to deal with the same, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible.

¶11

The writ petition is disposed of , accordingly.

¶12

Order Date :- 18.11.2022 Harshita

¶13

Digitally signed by HARSHITA Date: 2022.11.22 10:32:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pinky Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pinky Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girish Chandra Agrawal and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mohammad Ayyub Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shrawan Kumar Jain and 5 Others Vs the State of U P and 2 Others

Sushil Chandra Umrav Vs Union Of India and 3 Others

M/S Cento Footwear Pvt. Ltd. and 5 Others Vs Tata Capitals Finance Service Ltd. and 5 Others

Rahul Deo Vs State of U.P. and Another