Roopa v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a writ petition seeking compensation for acquired land. The petitioner failed to prove her name was recorded in revenue rolls at the time of acquisition. The Court held that compensation cannot be paid to a non-tenure holder when land had already been awarded to recorded holders.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for compensation for Gata no.2244 admeasuring 532 Kari is dismissed.