The single judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that it has become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2915 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Naina And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Haya Rizvi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Sri Ajai Kumar, holding brief of Ms Haya Rizvi, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no instructions in the matter.
It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous..
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.04.25 16:33:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Naina And Another
State Of U.P.
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
