In this writ petition, no one appeared for the petitioners to press their case. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition as not maintainable and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28803 of 2022
Petitioner :- Samina And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Verma,Anemash Kumar Kushwaha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Learned standing counsel submits that seeking same relief, the petitioners have preferred Writ C No. 28785 of 2022 ( Samina & Another Vs. State of U.P. & Others ) in this Court.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.11.2022 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.11.02 16:18:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Samina
State Of U.P.
Piyush Agrawal
Amit Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
