In this writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired in 1969, the petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the petition during arguments. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without passing any reasoned order on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.6
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 2774 of 2022
Ram Pravesh and others
.....Petitioners
Through :- Mr. Jitendra Prasad Kushwaha, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Jagdish Pathak, Standing Counsel for the respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
The prayer made in the present writ petition is for direction to the respondents to pay compensation for the land allegedly owned by the petitioners, which was acquired way back in the year 1969.
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 16.02.2022 Rakesh/Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Ram Pravesh and others
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
