The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to enter his name in revenue papers. The Court directed the petitioner to seek correction under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26370 of 2022
Petitioner :- Suhel Ahamd Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Mohd. Khalid Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Punit Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devendra Mishra holding brief of Respondent nos. 1 and 2 and learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus commanding the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Jakhaniya, District Ghazipur, to bring on record, the name of the petitioner in the revenue papers.
If that is the grievance of the petitioner, he may file an application for correction of the records under the relevant provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
With these observation, writ petition stands disposed of .
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Digitally signed by NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2022.09.07 09:41:23 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to enter the petitioner's name in revenue papers via writ of mandamus.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suhel Ahamd
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Siddhartha Varma
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
