Harvinder Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26063 of 2022…
What did the court decide?
prayer to dismiss the petition as not pressed is allowed
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26063 of 2022…
prayer to dismiss the petition as not pressed is allowed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26063 of 2022
Petitioner :- Harvinder Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Asif,Nasim Uddin Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Anadi Krishna Narayana
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
A preliminary objection has been raised by Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4 namely Branch Manager Bank of Baroda, branch Pahadpur, District Rampur that loan was taken by the petitioner from Bank of Baroda, Plot No. 42, Sector 5 Sidcul Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, 263153 (Uttrakhand), therefore, the writ petition is not at all maintainable before this Court.
After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the present petition as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Uttrakhand High Court.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.
Order Date :- 5.9.2022 Swati
Digitally signed by SWATI PATHAK Date: 2022.09.06 09:47:00 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Harvinder Singh
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
Swati Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court