The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners did not appear even in revised call. An interim order dated 18.07.2005 was vacated.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order of 18.07.2005 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2474 of 2005
Petitioner :- Ram Babu And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Khandelwal,Gajendra Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arvind Kumar Dixit,Lokendra Pratap Singh,Rajeev Sharma,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
None appears for the petitioners even in revised call. However, Shri Jitendra Narain Rai, learned A.C.S.C. is present for the State-respondents.
The matter relates to the year 2004.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order dated 18.07.2005, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 15.12.2022 Vinod.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL Date: 2022.12.15 15:01:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Babu
Addl. Commissioner
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
