Ram Nath v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution because no party was present to press it on the hearing date. Interim order vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution because no party was present to press it on the hearing date. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24360 of 2000
Petitioner :- Ram Nath Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Singh,Anurag Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
List revised. Nobody is present to press the present writ petition on behalf of petitioner.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.9.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.09.08 14:17:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Nath
State of U.P.
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court