Petitioner alleged pending remand proceedings from an appeal order dated 30.10.2021. Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent No. 2 to expedite compliance within three months.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to ensure speedy compliance of the appeal order dated 30.10.2021 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18780 of 2022
Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharm Singh Parmar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the proceedings in remand have not been concluded in pursuance of the appeal order dated 30.10.2021. According to the petitioner, no proceedings have been drawn up, as yet.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon respondent no.2 to ensure speedy compliance of the appeal order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months, from the date of presentation of a copy of this order, provided the petitioner does not seek any adjournment.
Order Date :- 8.7.2022 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by SHUBHAM CHAURASIA Date: 2022.07.08 18:39:32 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is directed to ensure speedy compliance of a prior appeal order regarding concluded remand proceedings.
Akhilesh Kumar
State of U.P.
Another
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Shubham Chaurasia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
