The writ court held that since the private respondent's term was over and enquiry was continuing, no further direction was required from the writ court at the stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18645 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mohit Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Vashistha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Petitioner seeks a direction upon the District Panchayatraj Officer to conclude the enquiry proceedings arising on his complaint made against the private respondent.
In the first place, the term of the private respondent is over. Further, Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.6 states that the enquiry proceedings are continuing. They are likely to be concluded soon.
In view of the above statement made, no further direction is required by the writ court, at this stage. Leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue early conclusion of the enquiry, before the administrative authorities, the writ petition stands disposed of , at this stage.
Order Date :- 7.7.2022 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by SHUBHAM CHAURASIA Date: 2022.07.07 17:26:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohit
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
