Ganesh Chauhan v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
No one appeared for the petitioner or respondent to press the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
No one appeared for the petitioner or respondent to press the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 50938 of 2009
Petitioner :- Ganesh Chauhan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.B. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
The case has been taken up in the revised call.
No one is present for the parties to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.9.2022 vkj
(Ajit Singh, J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL Date: 2022.09.27 10:59:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganesh Chauhan
State of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court