Writ petition filed challenging an order under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Petitioner withdrew prayer after acknowledging statutory revision remedy available under the Code. Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Petitioner's prayer for withdrawal accepted; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17796 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ram Govind Chaturvedi Respondent :- State Of U P And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Chandra Naik Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Upon being pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the State respondents that the order dated 28.1.2022 passed under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is sought to be assailed in the present writ petition, is subject to the remedy of a statutory revision, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition and states that the petitioner would avail the statutory alternative remedy.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 23.9.2022 Kirti
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J)
Digitally signed by KIRTI SAHU Date: 2022.09.23 16:48:08 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of when the petitioner accepts the availability of statutory alternative remedy of revision under Section 38(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Govind Chaturvedi
State Of U P
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
