Raj Nath v. State of U.P. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a direction to decide a revision order within time. State counsel submitted the matter was already decided. Discharged accordingly.
Petitioner sought a direction to decide a revision order within time. State counsel submitted the matter was already decided. Discharged accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23480 of 2022
Petitioner :- Raj Nath Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents.
The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 7/ Additional Commissioner (Administration), Azamgarh Division, District- Azamgarh to decide the Revision No. C-199315000010 (Rajesh vs. Raj Nath and 5 Others) filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, within a stipulated time period.
Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents submits that pursuant to the previous order, instructions have been received from the respondent authorities wherein it has been indicated that the aforesaid revision has been finally decided in terms of an order dated 20.08.2022.
In view of the aforestated stand taken by the State respondents, counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to pursue the matter any further.
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 22.9.2022 Aditya
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by ADITYA KUSHWAHA Date: 2022.09.22 17:27:40 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent authorities to decide the Revision No. C-199315000010 within a stipulated time period.
Raj Nath
State Of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court