Sheshpal Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed by the Court as the petitioner did not press the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed by the Court as the petitioner did not press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17768 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sheshpal Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Nath,Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Prakash Mishra
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
Sri Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
The order has been passed in the presence of Sri Hari Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 4.
Order Date :- 13.7.2022 Rameez
(Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by RAMEEZ AHMED Date: 2022.07.14 17:18:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheshpal Yadav
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Chandra Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court