This order dismisses a withdrawn writ petition. The petitioner's counsel requested dismissal and the respondent offered no objection.
Petitioner's prayer for dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17765 of 2022
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Srivastava And 8 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Srestha Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Sri Sreshta Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 22.8.2022 piyush
(Vikas Budhwar, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Digitally signed by PIYUSH KUMAR Date: 2022.08.23 10:44:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Kumar Srivastava And 8 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Siddhartha Varma
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
