Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition had become infructuous and was withdrawn. The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16279 of 2022
Petitioner :- Shikha Kasyap And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Shri Krishna Kant Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, states that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.8.2022 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.08.17 13:29:49 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shikha Kasyap And Another
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
