The writ petition was listed for hearing on date 16.8.2022, but it was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel and failure to serve notice on respondent no. 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17338 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pushpanjali Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
List revised. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition, in spite of the notice being displayed in the display board.
On perusal of the order sheet, it reveals that twice time was granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to take steps to serve the notice on respondent no. 4, but no steps have yet been taken.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 16.8.2022 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2022.08.16 15:50:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pushpanjali Singh
State Of U.P.
Piyush Agrawal
Amit Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
