Petitioner sought writ relief; counsel stated the petition had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ petition without detailed reasoning as the cause of action no longer existed.
None; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16095 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ratan Global School Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pooja Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Ms. Shruti Taneja holding brief of Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 23.9.2022 SK
(Jayant Banerji, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by SUSHEEL KUMAR Date: 2022.09.23 14:33:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ratan Global School
State Of U P
2nd Respondent
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
