The High Court allowed the present writ petition on identical terms as a previous petition (Writ - C No. 12030 of 2018) due to similar facts and issues, quashing the District Magistrate's order.
Petitioner's writ petition allowed; Impugned order of District Magistrate quashed on same terms as connected writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12877 of 2022
Petitioner :- Lalit Kumar And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 17.5.2022 Prakhar
Digitally signed by PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.05.17 17:01:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Asha Devi & 20 Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Ors.Relied on¶5
Writ - C No. 12030 of 2018 (Asha Devi & 20 Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Ors.)
Lalit Kumar And 5 Others
State Of U P And 2 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
