Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail further remedies. The court dismissed the writ petition giving the liberty as prayed.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.35
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 1252 of 2022
Aditya Kumar Through :- Mr. Chandrachud Pandey, Advocate
.....Petitioner
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondent Through :- Mr. Hare Ram, State Law Officer for respondent Nos.1 to 6 and 8
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail of the appropriate remedy.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Prakash Padia, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 27.01.2022 Kuldeep/Saqlain
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Aditya Kumar
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
