Petitioner filed a PIL seeking closure of a diagnostic center due to a personal dispute over service. The court held the petition lacked public interest and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 42
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2411 of 2021
Rajesh Pratap Singh .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Intekhab Alam Khan, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
State of U.P. and others .....Respondent Through :- Mr. Ramanand Pandey, Standing Counsel
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, JUDGE
ORDER
(Prakash Padia, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 27.01.2022 Manish Himwan/Swati
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Rajesh Pratap Singh
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
