A writ petition filed under WRIT - A No. - 9995 of 2021 was dismissed as infructuous because the examination for which the petitioner sought an extension of time had already been concluded and the result declared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9995 of 2021
Petitioner :- Nikhil Porwal And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.S.Parihar
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
List revised. None present for the petitioners.
Sri A.K.S. Parihar learned counsel for the Board and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents are present.
The examination with respect to which extension of time was sought has long been held and result declared. In view of the above, present petition has been rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.12.2022 Faraz
Digitally signed by FARAZ AHMAD Date: 2022.12.06 17:09:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nikhil Porwal
State Of U.P.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
