The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a civil miscellaneous application. Consequently, the underlying writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No interim order was maintained.
Withdrawal application allowed; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 391 of 2022
Petitioner :- Roomi Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- J.P. Singh,Dhirendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Chandel
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 03 of 2022
Sri J.P. Singh learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner does not wish to press the instant petition any further and it may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, withdrawal application is allowed .
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order on petition
Dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 3.12.2022 Faraz
Digitally signed by FARAZ AHMAD Date: 2022.12.05 10:10:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Roomi Bano
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Faraz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
