Vipin Arora v. State of U P and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner despite a prayer to accept it, with liberty to file afresh.
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner despite a prayer to accept it, with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3440 of 2022
Petitioner :- Vipin Arora Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Ram Krishna Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kushmondeya Shahi
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the present writ petition as there is some mistakes in the array of the parties and the same may be dismissed as such with the liberty to file afresh.
Prayer is accepted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
This order has been passed in the presence of learned Standing counsel as well as Sri K.Shahi, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
Order Date :- 11.4.2022 Akbar
Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AKBAR Date: 2022.04.12 15:48:32 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipin Arora
State Of U P
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court