In this PIL regarding pollution from a brick kiln, the Court held that no further direction was needed as the kiln was already closed following an inspection and pending criminal proceedings.
No further direction issued as the brick kiln was already closed and proceedings against relevant parties were pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.9
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 52 of 2022
Geeta Devi
.....Petitioner
Through :-Mr. Shivendra Nath Singh, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondent
Through :- Mr. Rajeev Singh, Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Dr. Hari Nath Tripathi, Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
2 WPIL No. 52 of 2022
The prayer made in the petition has been rendered infructuous.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 25.01.2022 Manish Himwan/AHA
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction to close a polluting brick kiln is necessary when an independent proceeding has already been initiated and the kiln was closed during inspection.
Geeta Devi
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
