Public Interest Litigation filed in 2012 was dismissed as infructuous by this Court relying on its earlier judgment in Designarch Infrastructure, reported in 2013 ADJ 594.
Dismissal of the present petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 307
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 46288 of 2012
Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Kunal Ravi Singh, Advocate. Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Hare Ram Tripathi, Standing Counsel, Mr. Kaushlendra Nath Singh, Advocate.
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The present petition has been filed in public interest way back in the year 2012.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 submitted that the issue raised in the present petition has now rendered infructuous in view of the judgement of this Court in M/s Designarch Infrastructure Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority reported in 2013 (9) ADJ 594.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Date :- 2.2.2022
Amit Mishra/Nirmal Sinha
( Piyush Agrawal,J. ) ( Rajesh Bindal,C.J. )
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s Designarch Infrastructure Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development AuthorityExplained¶7
M/s Designarch Infrastructure Vs. Vice Chairman, Ghaziabad Development Authority reported in 2013 (9) ADJ 594
Alok Kumar
The State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
