The High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition for want of prosecution. The petitioners failed to comply with an order dated 20.11.2018 requiring a security deposit, indicating a lack of interest to contest the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3898 of 2018
Petitioner :- Jyoti Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun,Vinay Kumar Pal
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None responds the call either on behalf of petitioners or respondent nos. 4 & 5.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Perusal of the record reveals that the petitioners have not complied with the order dated 20.11.2018 passed by this Court, wherein an amount of Rs. 25,000/- was directed to be deposited by petitioner no. 1, which shows lackness of interest to contest the case on the part of petitioners.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.2.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.02.16 14:58:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jyoti Devi
Unnamed Petitioner
State Of U.P.
Unnamed Respondent 4
Unnamed Respondent 5
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
