Single judge dismissed a transfer application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear after notice.
The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 197 of 2018
Applicant :- Radhey Shyam Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- Shrinath,Chandrakant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,S.R. Verma
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and peruse the record.
None responds the call either on behalf of applicant or opposite party no. 2 to 6.
Perusal of order sheet reveals that none appeared to press this application on previous date i.e. 08.03.2022 and case was listed for today but today also none appears on behalf of applicant.
In view of the above, this Transfer Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 15.3.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.03.15 13:53:53 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam Yadav
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
