The High Court dismissed a habeas corpus writ petition filed in 2010 as infructuous because of the efflux of time, noting that neither the petitioner nor respondents appeared before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 14694 of 2010
Petitioner :- Rahmana Thru Her Mother Smt. Shajna Respondent :- Shah Nawaz And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.,A.K.S.Bais
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
None responds the call either on behalf of petitioner or respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This petition is pending since 2010 and has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.3.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.03.15 13:54:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to proceed with a habeas corpus petition filed in 2010 which remains pending due to lack of response.
Rahmana Thru Her Mother Smt. Shajna
Shah Nawaz
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
