This special appeal challenging an interlocutory order dated 19.6.2006 in W.P. No.3001(MS)/2006 was dismissed as special appeals are not maintainable against interlocutory orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 439 of 2006
Appellant :- Ashok Kumar Verma W.P.No.3001/Ms/2006 Respondent :- Dr.Virendra Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Swayambhoo Chandranshul Counsel for Respondent :- Prashant Chandra,N.K.Seth
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
This special appeal filed under Chapter VIII Rule-5 of the Rules of the Court challenges an order dated 19.6.2006 passed in Writ Petition No.3001 (MS) of 2006 which is purely an interlocutory order.
Admittedly, against an interlocutory order special appeal is not maintainable.
Accordingly, this special appeal is hereby dismissed .
Order Date :- 14.12.2022 RS
Digitally signed by RAKESH SINGH Date: 2022.12.14 19:23:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a special appeal challenging an interlocutory order of a writ petition is maintainable under Chapter VIII Rule-5 of the Rules of the Court?
Ashok Kumar Verma
Dr. Virendra Singh And Others
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
