The special appeal challenging an interlocutory order dated 15.6.2006 was dismissed as not maintainable against interlocutory orders, though the appellant was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 420 of 2006
Appellant :- District Basic Education Officer Sitapur Respondent :- Shiv Kumar Verma And Anr. S/S 5289/2006 Counsel for Appellant :- Vijay Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- Illigible
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the appellant.
Even otherwise by means of this special appeal, challenge has been made to an order dated 15.6.2006 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5289 (S/S) of 2006 which is completely interlocutory in nature.
Admittedly, against an interlocutory order special appeal is not maintainable.
Thus this special appeal is hereby dismissed .
Order Date :- 14.12.2022 RS
Digitally signed by RAKESH SINGH Date: 2022.12.14 19:43:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a special appeal against an interlocutory order is maintainable.
Whether the special appeal deserves to be allowed.
District Basic Education Officer Sitapur
Shiv Kumar Verma And Anr
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
