Special appeal against rejection of claim for Old Pension Scheme benefits. Court held appellant appointed after NPS enforcement, thus ineligible. Dismissed appeal.
Application rejected; appellant denied Old Pension Scheme benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 3020
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 307 of 2022
(arising out of Writ - A No. 11786 of 2020)
Rajesh Prasad
.....Appellant
Through :- Mr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Mohan Srivastava, Standing Counsel
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, JUDGE
ORDER
2 SPLA No. 307 of 2022
fresh appointment cannot be ante-dated.
(J.J. Munir) (Rajesh Bindal) Judge Chief Justice
Allahabad
15.09.2022
I. Batabyal/Deepak
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by ISHAN BATABYAL Date: 2022.09.28 10:25:14 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an employee appointed after the switch to the New Pension Scheme is entitled to benefits under the Old Pension Scheme.
Whether delay in appointment excuses an employee from the rule that appointments cannot be ante-dated.
Rajesh Prasad
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
