The Hon'ble Chief Justice's Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging the validity of U.P. Act No. 42 of 2006. The court held that the Act had already been upheld in a prior division bench judgment, leaving nothing subsisting in the current petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 3003
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5947 of 2007
Shikshak Samajik Kalyan Samiti through its Secretary
.....Petitioner
v/s
State of U.P. through Pramukh Sachiv and others .....Respondents Through :- Mr. A.K. Ray, Additional Chief Standing Counsel
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, JUDGE
ORDER
and others v. State of U.P. and others, 2008 (4) ADJ 304 (DB) .
(J.J. Munir) (Rajesh Bindal) Judge Chief Justice
Allahabad
14.09.2022 Deepak/I. Batabyal
Whether the order is speaking : No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.09.27 14:41:36 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the validity of U.P. Act No. 42 of 2006 is challengeable in the present petition after-upheld-in-precedent
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Anurag Tripathi and others v. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶10
Anurag Tripathi and others v. State of U.P. and others, 2008 (4) ADJ 304 (DB)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shikshak Samajik Kalyan Samiti
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
J.J. Munir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
