Khushi Chittodiya and Another v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A Habeas Corpus petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners submitted that the alleged corpus had already been recovered by the authorities.
A Habeas Corpus petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioners submitted that the alleged corpus had already been recovered by the authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 67 of 2022
Petitioner :- Khushi Chittodiya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition has become infructuous as the corpus has been recovered.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.2.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.02.14 16:29:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Khushi Chittodiya
Unnamed Second Petitioner
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court