The habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel and want of prosecution during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 41921 of 2017
Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Balbeer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
As nobody is present to press this Petition, hence this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 25.3.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.03.25 16:54:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anoop Kumar
Another
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
